翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Rabinowitz
・ United States v. Raines
・ United States v. Ramsey
・ United States v. Ramsey (1926)
・ United States v. Reese
・ United States v. Regenerative Sciences, LLC
・ United States v. Reidel
・ United States v. Reynolds
・ United States v. Richardson
・ United States v. Riggs
・ United States v. Riverside Bayview
・ United States v. Robel
・ United States v. Robinson
・ United States v. Rodriquez
・ United States v. Rogers
United States v. Ross
・ United States v. Russell
・ United States v. Rybar
・ United States v. Salerno
・ United States v. Sandoval
・ United States v. Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Co.
・ United States v. Scheffer
・ United States v. Scheinberg
・ United States v. Schoon
・ United States v. Schooner Peggy
・ United States v. Schooner Sally
・ United States v. Schwimmer
・ United States v. Screws
・ United States v. Seale
・ United States v. Seeger


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Ross : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Ross

''United States v. Ross'', 456 U.S. 798 (1982), was a search and seizure case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States. The high court was asked to decide if a legal warrantless search of an automobile allows closed containers found in the vehicle (specifically, in the trunk) to be searched as well. The appeals court had previously ruled that opening and searching the closed portable containers without a warrant was a violation of the Fourth Amendment, even though the warrantless vehicle search was permissible due to existing precedent.
== Background ==
On November 27, 1978, Washington, D.C. police detectives received a tip from a reliable source describing a man known as "Bandit" who was selling illegal narcotics stored in the trunk of his car. The informant gave the location of the car and a description of both car and driver. The detectives discovered the parked car, and called for a computer check on the car, which confirmed that the car's owner matched the description and used the alias "Bandit". Shortly thereafter they observed the car being driven by a man matching the description. They stopped the car and ordered the driver out. After noticing a bullet on the front seat, they searched the glove compartment and discovered a pistol, at which point they arrested the driver, identified as Albert Ross. A detective then opened the trunk and discovered a closed brown paper bag. He opened the bag and found numerous bags containing white powder, which were later identified as heroin. During a later search, they also found and opened a zippered red leather pouch, which contained $3,200 in cash. No warrant was obtained for these searches.
Ross' attorneys made a pretrial motion to suppress the evidence found in the bag and the pouch on the grounds that the warrantless search of the car does not extend to searching closed containers found within. That motion was denied, but on appeal the D.C. Circuit Court reversed that decision, holding that the warrantless search of the two closed bags was unconstitutional. The matter was appealed to the Supreme Court and argued before the court on March 1, 1982.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Ross」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.